Lamb, Meters. Age., & Gilbride, K. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Detected similarity and you will relationships profits among relationships people: An enthusiastic idiographic strategy
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). In the event that I am not saying hot, have you been sizzling hot or perhaps not?: Physical-elegance analysis and you may relationships preferences as a function of an individual’s individual elegance. Emotional Research, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other close relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. Inside the J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality together with behavior disorders (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Drive. [ Backlinks ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship dating fate having insiders’ and you may outsiders’ perspective: Exactly who and what’s asked matters. Private Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality inside the newly weds: A couple of situated strategy. Journal away from Character and you will Personal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Dating. Washington, DC: Statement to the Pew Internet sites & Western Lifestyle Project. Recovered , of [ Hyperlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Examining the accuracy regarding predictions throughout the dating matchmaking: How and why create lovers’ predictions range from men and women from observers? Character and you may Personal Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Hyperlinks ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing issues about initiation out-of heterosexual relationship. Paper shown https://internationalwomen.net/sv/egyptiska-kvinnor/ at the Earliest Around the world Appointment to the Individual Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Merkle, Elizabeth.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A good. (2000). Electronic dating and you will virtual relevant: Conceptualizing computer system mediated romantic dating. Family relations, forty-two, 187-192. [ Website links ]
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually genuine similarity important for destination? A meta-analysis out of genuine and you may thought similarity. Log out of Public and personal Matchmaking, 25, 889-922. [ Website links ]
Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Relationships pleasure as a great predictor away from resemblance recommendations; A test of one’s interest-resemblance theory. Log out of Societal and private Dating, twenty two, 561-584. [ Links ]
Diary out-of Public and private Relationships, 23, 865-880
Morry, Yards. Yards. (2007). New interest-resemblance hypothesis one of get across-sex household members: Relationship satisfaction, thought parallels, and self-providing perceptions. Record of Social and private Matchmaking, 24, 117-138. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may expansion of one’s SVR idea away from dyadic pairing. Journal from ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll divorce case: A fourteen-year longitudinal examination of black colored partners and you will light partners. Record away from Public and personal Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The new like formula Meets believes this has receive a formula to possess governing the web relationship company: A scientific strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Correct. Company dos.0 Journal. Retrieved to your of [ Links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Identification parallels when you look at the partners. Personality and you may Individual Differences, forty five, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Companion needs: Just what properties do folk appeal in their small-name sexual and you can long-title romantic lovers? Record out of Psychology and you may Human Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The character of care about on the initiation and you can course of personal telecommunications. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]